Ключевые слова

Usability, satisfaction, design tools, evaluation software, multimedia annotations, educational software, MOOC, university education

Резюме

The worldwide boom in digital video may be one of the reasons behind the exponential growth of MOOCs. The evaluation of a MOOC requires a great degree of multimedia and collaborative interaction. Given that videos are one of the main elements in these courses, it would be interesting to work on innovations that would allow users to interact with multimedia and collaborative activities within the videos. This paper is part of a collaboration project whose main objective is «to design and develop multimedia annotation tools to improve user interaction with contents». This paper will discuss the assessment of two tools: Collaborative Annotation Tool (CaTool) and Open Video Annotation (OVA). The latter was developed by the aforementioned project and integrated into the edX MOOC. The project spanned two academic years (2012-2014) and the assessment tools were tested on different groups in the Faculty of Education, with responses from a total of 180 students. Data obtained from both tools were compared by using average contrasts. Results showed significant differences in favour of the second tool (OVA). The project concludes with a useful video annotation tool, whose design was approved by users, and which is also a quick and user-friendly instrument to evaluate any software or MOOC. A comprehensive review of video annotation tools was also carried out at the end of the project.

Ссылки

Aguaded, I. & Sánchez, J. (2008). Niños adolescentes tras el visor de la cámara: expe-riencias de alfabetización audiovisual. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 14, 293-308.

Link Google Scholar

Aguaded, J. & Macías, Y. (2008). Televisión universitaria y servicio público. Co-municar, 31, XVI, 681-689. (http://doi.org/cd4fkw).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Angehrn, A., Luccini, A. & Maxwell, K. (2009). InnoTube: A Video-based Connection Tool Supporting Collaborative Innovation. Interactive Learning Environments, 17, 3, 205-220. (http://doi.org/bw48vv).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Area, M. (2005). Los criterios de calidad en el diseño y desarrollo de materiales didácticos para la www. Comunicación y Pedagogía, 204, 66-72.

Link Google Scholar

Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T. & Miller, J.T. (2008). An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T. & Miller, J.T. (2009). Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. Journal of Usability Studies. 4 (3), 114-123.

Link Google Scholar

Bargas, J.A., Lötscher, J., Orsini, S. & Opwis, K. (2009). Intranet Satisfaction Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure User Satisfaction with the Intranet. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1241-1250. (http://doi.org/b39md8).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bartolomé, A. (1997). Uso interactivo del vídeo. In J. Ferrés & P. Marques (Coord.), Comunicación educativa y nuevas tecnologías. Barcelona: Praxis. 320 (1-13).

Link Google Scholar

Bartolomé, A. (2003). Vídeo digital. Comunicar, 21, 39-47. (http://goo.gl/MDcYOt) (29-04-2014).

Link Google Scholar

Bevan, N. (1997). Quality and Usability: A New Framework. In Van Veenendaal, E. & McMullan, J. (Eds.), Achieving Software Product Quality. Netherlands: Tutein Nolthenius, 25-34.

Link Google Scholar

Blázquez, J.J., Chamizo, J., Cano, E. & Gutiérrez, S. (2013). Calidad de vida universitaria: Identificación de los principales indicadores de satisfacción estudiantil. Revista de Educación, 362, 458-484. (http://doi.org/tp5).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Cabero, J. (2004). El diseño de vídeos didácticos. In J. Salinas, J. Cabero & I. Aguaded (Coords.), Tecnologías para la educación: diseño, producción y evaluación de medios para la formación docente (PP. 141-156). Madrid: Alianza.

Link Google Scholar

Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza. Madrid: Alianza.

Link Google Scholar

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. & Bergman, M. (2014). Formative Assessment with eRubrics: an Approach to the State of the Art. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 12, 1, 23-29. (http://goo.gl/A4cpaa).

Link Google Scholar

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. & Monedero, J.J. (2014). Evolución en el diseño y fun-cionalidad de las rúbricas: desde las rúbricas «cuadradas» a las erúbricas federadas. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12, 1, 81-98. (http://goo.gl/xNhnqR).

Link Google Scholar

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (1994). Los vídeos didácticos: claves para su producción y evaluación. Pixel Bit. Sevilla, 1, 31-42. (http://goo.gl/w3Ayi6).

Link Google Scholar

Colasante, M. (2011). Using Video Annotation to Reflect on and Evaluate Physical Education Pre-service Teaching Practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 66-88. (http://goo.gl/f2HfZB).

Link Google Scholar

Díaz-Arias, R. (2009). El vídeo en el ciberespacio: usos y lenguaje. Comunicar, 33, 17, 63-71. (http://doi.org/ftt5qr).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Etscheidt, S. & Curran, C. (2012). Promoting Reflection in Teacher Preparation Pro-grams: A Multilevel Model. Teacher Education and Special Education 35(1) 7-26. (http://doi.org/dk53x2).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ferrés, J. (1992). Vídeo y educación. Barcelona: Paidós.

Link Google Scholar

García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.A., Sánchez-Alonso, S. & Lytras, M. (2009). Se-mantic Annotation of Video Fragments as Learning Objects: A Case Study with YouTube Videos and the Gene Ontology. Interactive Learning Environments, 19, 1, 25-44. (http://doi.org/b2pkpf).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

García-Valcárcel, A. (2008). El hipervídeo y su potencialidad pedagógica. Revista Lati-noamericana de Tecnología Educativa (RELATEC), 7, 2, 69-79.

Link Google Scholar

Giroux, H.A. (2001). Cultura, política y práctica educativa. Barcelona: Graó.

Link Google Scholar

Guo, P., Kim, H. & Rubin, R. (2014). How Video Production Affects Student En-gagement: An Empirical Study of MOOC Videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ scale conference (pp. 41-50. March 4-5, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. (http://doi.org/tp6).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.

Link Google Scholar

Hosack, B. (2010). VideoANT: Extending Online Video Annotation Beyond Content Delivery. TechTrends, 54, 3, 45-49.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ingram, J. (2014). Supporting Student Teachers in Developing and Applying Pro-fessional Knowledge with Videoed Events. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 51-62. (http://doi.org/tp7).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kirakowski, J. & Corbett, M. (1988). Measuring User Satisfaction. 4ª Conference of the British Computer Society Human-Computer Interaction Specialist Group, 329-338.

Link Google Scholar

McNamara, N. & Kirakowski, J. (2011). Measuring User-satisfaction with Electronic Consumer Products: The Consumer Products Questionnaire. International Journal Human-Computer Studies. 69, 375-386. (http://doi.org/d5xzqn).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Miller, M. & Carney, J. (2009). Lost in Translation: Using Video Annotation Software to Examine How a Clinical Supervisor Interprets and Applies a State-mandated Teacher Assessment Instrument. The Teacher Educator, 44(4), 217-231, (http://doi.org/dhj2bv).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Molich, R., Ede, M.R., Kaasgaard, K. & Karyukin, B. (2004). Comparative Usability Evaluation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(1), 65-74.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Orland-Barak, L. & Rachamim, M. (2009). Simultaneous Reflections by Video in a Second-order Action Research-mentoring Model: Lessons for the Mentor and the Mentee. Reflective Practice, 10, 5, 601-613. (http://doi.org/db82mr).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Picci, P., Calvani, A. & Bonaiuti, G. (2012). The Use of Digital Video Annotation in Teacher Training: The Teachers’ Perspective. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 600-613. (http://doi.org/tp8).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rich, P. & Trip, T. (2011). Ten Essential Questions Educators Should Ask When Using Video Annotation Tools. TechTrends, 55, 6, 16-24.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009a). Scaffolded Video Self-analysis: Discrepancies between Preservice Teachers’ Perceived and Actual Instructional Decisions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(2), 128-145.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rich, P.J. & Hannafin, M. (2009b). Video Annotation Tools. Technologies to Scaffold, Structure, and Transform Teacher Reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 1, 52-67. (http://doi.org/dzdv4n).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Salinas, J. (2013). Audio y vídeo Podcast para el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras en la formación docente inicial. IV Jornadas Internacionales de Campus Virtuales. 14-15 Febrero. Universidad de las Islas Baleares. (http://goo.gl/EHq2Jo) (29-04-2014).

Link Google Scholar

Sauro, J. (2011). Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) (http://goo.gl/63krpp) (29-04-2014).

Link Google Scholar

Schön, D.A. (1998). El profesional reflexivo: ¿cómo piensan los profesionales cuando actúan? Barcelona: Paidós.

Link Google Scholar

Vázquez-Cano, E. (2013). El videoartículo: nuevo formato de divulgación en revistas científicas y su integración en MOOC. Comunicar, 41, XXI, 83-91.(http://doi.org/tnk).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Yang, S., Zhang, J., Su, A. & Tsai, J. (2011). A collaborative multimedia annotation tool for enhancing knowledge sharing in CSCL. Interactive Learning Environments 19, 1, 45-62. (http://doi.org/cdtxd7).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Техническая спецификация

Получила: 30-04-2014

пересмотренный: 19-05-2014

Принятый: 21-06-2014

OnlineFirst: 15-11-2014

Дата публикации: 01-01-2015

Время пересмотра статьи: 19 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 44: 37 дней

Время принятия статьи: 52 дней | Время приема Номер 44: 69 дней

Время редактирования препринта: 201 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 44: 197 дней

Время редактирования статьи: 246 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 44: 242 дней

метрика

Метрики этой статьи

Просмотров: 43158

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 35123

загрузки PDF-файлов: 8035

Полные метрики 44

Просмотров: 1144315

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 908020

загрузки PDF-файлов: 236295

Цитируется

Цитаты в Web of Science

Hernandez-Dominguez, J.; Perez-Cortes, A. J.;. ANALYSIS OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL ACCEPTANCE OF MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AT UNIVERSITY PHYSICAL EDUCATION LEARNING JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH RESEARCH , 2020.

Link Google Scholar

Maiz Olazabalaga, Inmaculada; Castano Garrido, Carlos; Garay Ruiz, Urtza. Research on MOOCs: Trends and Methodologies PORTA LINGUARUM, 2016.

Link Google Scholar

Lemos-de-Carvalho-Junior, Giovani; Raposo-Rivas, Manuela; Cebrian-de-la-Serna, Manuel; Sarmiento-Campos, Jose A.. Analysis of the pedagogical perspective of the MOOCs available in Portuguese REVISTA ESPANOLA DE PEDAGOGIA, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-1-2017-06

Belen Perez-Torregrosa, Ana; Diaz-Martin, Cristina; Ibanez-Cubillas, Pilar. The use of Video annotation tools in teacher training Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.090

Bartolome-Pina, Antonio; Garcia-Ruiz, Rosa; Aguaded, Ignacio. Blended learning: overview and expectations RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18842

Espigares Pinazo, Manuel Jesus; Bautista Vallejo, Jose Manuel. Assessment of digital learning objects in Moodle EDUCATIO SIGLO XXI, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.6018/j/350051

Lemos de Carvalho, Giovani, Jr.; Cebrian Robles, Daniel; Cebrian de la Serna, Manuel; Raposo Rivas, Manuela. COMPARATIVE STUDY SPOC VS. MOOC FOR SOCIO-TECHNICAL CONTENTS FROM USABILITY AND USER SATISFACTION TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2019.

Link Google Scholar

Tabuenca, Bernardo; Kalz, Marco; Lohr, Ansje. Massive Open Online Education for Environmental Activism: The Worldwide Problem of Marine Litter SUSTAINABILITY, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102860

Martinez Romera, Daniel David; Cebrian Robles, Daniel. Videographic analysis for assessment of the external work placements in the initial stages of secondary school teacher training EDUCAR, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.873

Osuna-Acedo, Sara; Gil-Quintana, Javier; . sMOOC, A New Training Model in Second Language Learning. Case study AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1705085

Cebrian-Robles, D; Franco-Mariscal, AJ and Blanco-Lopez, A. Sequence of tasks to teach argumentation in science to pre-service teachers through CoRubric. Exemplification in an activity on a saline power plant DIDACTICA DE LAS CIENCIAS EXPERIMENTALES Y SOCIALES , 2021.

https://doi.org/10.7203/DCES.40.18178

Cebrian-de-la-Serna, Manuel; Jesus Gallego-Arrufat, Maria; Cebrian-Robles, Violeta; . Multimedia Annotations for Practical Collaborative Reasoning JOURNAL OF NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021.

https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.664

Wu, Bing; Zhang, Chenyan. Behavior and Intention in MOOCs Research Advances in Intelligent Systems Research, 2016.

Link Google Scholar

Liu, Shuqing; Liang, Tianyi; Shao, Shuai;. Evaluating Localized MOOCs: The Role of Culture on Interface Design and User Experience IEEE ACCESS , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986036

Espigares-Pinazo, Manuel J.; Bautista-Vallejo, Jose M.; Garcia-Carmona, Marina;. Evaluations in the Moodle-Mediated Music Teaching-Learning Environment TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09468-0

Цитаты в Scopus

Garrido Gómez, M.I.. The communicability in MOOC, its strengthen by the multimedia annotations [La comunicabilidad en los MOOC y su potenciación mediante las anotaciones multimedia]), Opcion, .

Link Google Scholar

Maiz Olazabalaga, I., Castaño Garrido, C., Garay Ruiz, U.. Research on MOOCS: Trends, methodologies [Investigación en MOOC: Tendencias y metodologías]), Porta Linguarum, .

Link Google Scholar

Lemos-De-Carvalho, G., Jr., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrián-De-La-Serna, M., Sarmiento-Campos, J.A.. Analysis of the pedagogical perspective of the MOOCs available in Portuguese [Análisis de la perspectiva pedagógica de los MOOC ofertados en lengua portuguesa]), Revista Espanola de Pedagogia, .

https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-1-2017-06

Blackmon, S.J., Major, C.H.. Wherefore art thou MOOC?: Defining massive open online courses), Online Learning Journal, .

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1272

Villavicencio, M., Pincay, J., Desiderio, K., Quimba, S.. Reusing, creating OERs for software engineering training), JIISIC 2018 - Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Ingenieria de Software e Ingenieria del Conocimiento, .

Link Google Scholar

Arnavut, A., Bicen, H.. Determination of teachers’ perspectives, level of readiness towards MOOCs for tolerance education), Quality, Quantity, .

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0546-z

de Carvalho Junior, G.L., Robles, D.C., de la Serna, M.C., Rivas, M.R.. Comparative study Spoc Vs. Mooc for socio-technical contents from usability, user satisfaction), Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, .

Link Google Scholar

Martínez Romera, D.D., Robles, D.C.. Videographic analysis for assessment of the external work placements in the initial stages of secondary school teacher training [Análisis videográfico para la evaluación de los aprendizajes en las prácticas externas de la formación inicial de docentes de secundaria]), Educar, .

https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.873

Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Löhr, A.. Massive open online education for environmental activism: The worldwide problem of marine litter), Sustainability (Switzerland), .

https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102860

Bernal-Torres, C.A., Hoyos, J.D., Fracica, G., Fernández-Otoya, F.A. . Use of video in taekwondo learning: A study in children in school age | [Uso del video en el aprendizaje del taekwondo: estudio en niños en edad escolar]), Informacion Tecnologica, .

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000100311

Osuna-Acedo, S., Gil-Quintana, J. . sMOOC, Un Nuevo Modelo De Formación En El Aprendizaje Del Segundo Idioma. Estudio De Caso), American Journal of Distance Education, .

https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1705085

Costa, C., Teixeira, L., Alvelos, H.. A study on massive open online courses in higher education), Atas da Conferencia da Associacao Portuguesa de Sistemas de Informacao, .

https://doi.org/10.18803/capsi.v15.125-141

Liu, S., Liang, T., Shao, S., Kong, J. . Evaluating Localized MOOCs: The Role of Culture on Interface Design and User Experience), IEEE Access, .

https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986036

Espigares-Pinazo, M.J., Bautista-Vallejo, J.M., García-Carmona, M. . Evaluations in the Moodle-Mediated Music Teaching-Learning Environment), Technology, Knowledge and Learning, .

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09468-0

Morales, C.R.M.. MOOC concerning the communication sciences targeting native Spanish speakers [MOOC referentes a las ciencias de la comunicación dirigidos a hispanohablantes]), Opcion, .

Link Google Scholar

Hernández-Domínguez, J., Pérez-Cortés, A.J. . Analysis of the technological acceptance of multimedia tools at university physical education learning | [Análisis de la aceptación tecnológica de herramientas multimedia en el proceso formativo de la educación física universitaria]), Journal of Sport and Health Research, .

Link Google Scholar

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., Cebrián-Robles, V. . Multimedia Annotations for Practical Collaborative Reasoning), Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, .

https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.664

2-s2.0-85121783286. The Use of Video Annotation in Education: A Review), Asian Journal of University Education, .

https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16208

Rey, F.J.R., Robles, V.C., de la Serna, M.C.. Study of videoposters using video annotations as a methodology for scientific events), Revista de Educación a Distancia, .

https://doi.org/10.6018/RED.478951

Цитаты в Google Scholar

Bartolomé Pina, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2018). Blended learning: panorama y perspectivas.

https://repositorio.unican.es/xmlui/handle/10902/15898

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., Cebrian Robles, D., & Serrano Puerto, J. (2015). Metodología para evaluar el impacto de las erúbricas y las anotaciones de vídeo en las prácticas externas.

https://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/handle/10630/10026

Maiz Olazabalaga, I., Castano Garrido, C., & Garay Ruiz, U. (2016). Research on MOOCs: trends and methodologies.

http://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/54092

Blackmon, S., & Major, C. (2017). Wherefore Art Thou MOOC: Defining Massive Open Online Courses. Online Learning Journal, 21(4).

https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183776/

LA HERRAMIENTA, D. E. A. D. E. V. O. V., & RÚBRICA, Y. (2015). Documentando el eportafolios federado con evidencias multimedia, anotaciones de video y erúbricas.

...

石小岑, & 李曼丽. (2016). 国际 MOOC 研究热点与趋势——基于 2013-2015 年文献的 Citespace 可视化分析. 开放教育研究, 22(1), 90-99.

http://www.cqvip.com/qk/80620x/201601/667728593.html

Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., Díaz-Martín, C., & Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. (2017). The use of Video annotation tools in teacher training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 458-464.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042817300903

Lemos-de-Carvalho-Júnior, G., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrían-de-la-Serna, M., & Sarmiento-Campos, J. A. (2017). Análisis de la perspectiva pedagógica de los MOOC ofertados en lengua portuguesa.

https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/6201

Romera, D. D. M., & Robles, D. C. (2019). Análisis videográfico para la evaluación de los aprendizajes en las prácticas externas de la formación inicial de docentes de secundaria. Educar, 55(2), 457-477.

https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Educar/article/view/359305

Lemos-de-Carvalho-Junior, G., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrian-de-la-Serna, M., & A. SARMIENTO-CAMPOS, J. (2017). Análisis de la perspectiva pedagógica de los MOOC ofertados en lengua portuguesa/Analysis of the pedagogical perspective of the MOOCs available in Portuguese. revista española de pedagogía, 101-119.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26379349

Costa, C., Teixeira, L., & Alvelos, H. (2017, March). A Study on Massive Open Online Courses in Higher Education. In Atas da Conferência da Associação Portuguesa de Sistemas de Informação (Vol. 15, No. 15, pp. 125-141).

http://capsi.apsi.pt/index.php/capsi/article/view/616

李金芳, 刘娜, 王莲, & 祝欣. (2015). 基于 xMOOC 课程模式的高校图书馆信息素养教育研究. 图书情报工作, 59(21), 56-62.

http://www.lis.ac.cn/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=20607

Rey, F. J. R., & Robles, D. C. Anotaciones de vídeo y estilos de aprendizaje en el Máster de Secundaria de Matemáticas. Publicado en. ISSN (En línea) Versión en línea, 678.

...

Robles, V. C. capítulo 2. lasanotacIonesenInternet: el Ágora dIgItal grIego.

http://gtea.uma.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/libro-gtea6.pdf#page=14

Hernández Domínguez, J., & Pérez-Cortés, A. J. HERRAMIENTAS TECNOLOGICAS MULTIMEDIA PARA EL ANALISIS DEL MOVIMIENTO EN ENTORNOS EDUCATIVOS. REVISIÓN BIBLIOGRÁFICA. MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE MOVEMENT IN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS. BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVIEW. ALCANCE DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN EN LA EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA, 74.

...

de la Serna, M. C. Recursos tecnológicos para un PLE-portafolios multimedia de calidad para el prácticum y las prácticas externas.

...

Martinez-Romera, D. D. (2018). Innovación e Investigación Educativa sobre la Evaluación de Competencias Profesionales con TIC para la Enseñanza de las Ciencias Sociales en el Máster de Profesorado.

https://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/handle/10630/17447

Romera, D. D. M., & Robles, D. C. Editado por.

https://educar.uab.cat/article/view/v55-n2-martinez-cebrian

Dos Santos, N. B., & Santos, G. L. (2018). PERSPECTIVAS EMERGENTES DAS PESQUISAS SOBRE MOOCS. CIET: EnPED.

http://cietenped.ufscar.br/submissao/index.php/2018/article/view/552

Arnavut, A., & Bicen, H. (2018). Determination of teachers’ perspectives and level of readiness towards MOOCs for tolerance education. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 929-943.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-017-0546-z

Wu, B., & Zhang, C. (2016, November). Behavior and Intention in MOOCs Research. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Engineering (AIIE 2016). Atlantis Press.

https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aiie-16/25866421

Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., & Löhr, A. (2019). Massive Open Online Education for Environmental Activism: The Worldwide Problem of Marine Litter. Sustainability, 11(10), 2860.

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2860

Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., Díaz-Martín, C., & Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. (2017). The use of Video annotation tools in teacher training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 458-464.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042817300903

Pinazo, M. J. E., & Vallejo, J. M. B. (2018). Evaluación de objetos digitales de aprendizaje musical en Moodle. Educatio Siglo XXI, 36(3), 377-396.

...

Ortiz Jiménez, J. G. MOOCS: miradas críticas desde la pedagogía.

http://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/13963

Gómez, M. I. G. (2015). La comunicabilidad en los MOOC y su potenciación mediante las anotaciones multimedia. Opción, 31(3), 528-540.

https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/310/31045567027.pdf

Martínez Chávez, M. E., Suárez, R., & Carolina, N. (2019). Instrumento Para Evaluar Desde La Transposición Didáctica Interna Objetos Virtuales De Aprendizaje En Probabilidad.

http://repository.unilibre.edu.co/handle/10901/15668

López Cueva, M. A. (2018). Elaboración de heurísticas para evaluar la usabilidad en aplicaciones web orientadas al comercio electrónico.

http://repositorio.unap.edu.pe/handle/UNAP/8879

Ortíz Jiménez, J. G., Rojas Mesa, J. E., Martínez, E., & Silva, A. Diseño de una propuesta de cursos Mooc desde la universidad Santo Tomás que permita implementar formas de aprendizaje y oportunidad educativa a poblaciones con diferentes características sociales, regionales, culturales, y de formación. Primera fase.

http://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/13590

Novillo Andrade, Á. F. (2018). Diseño e implementación de un MOOC, aplicando la metodología PACIE, para el desarrollo de nuevas estrategias pedagógicas con el uso de las TIC en la práctica docente y optimizar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje (Master's thesis, Universidad Casa Grande. Departamento de Posgrado).

http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/1526

Villavicencio, G. T., Santel, J. M., Palma, K. M. V., & Altamirano, A. C. (2019). Una experiencia interinstitucional de desarrollo de un MOOC para docentes en servicio. Apertura: Revista de Innovación Educativa, 11(1), 120-135.

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6940127

Fernández Rodrigo, L. (2018). Las TIC en programas socioeducativos: Evaluación de un Entorno Virtual como medio de soporte a profesionales en la implementación del programa Caminar en Familia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat de Lleida).

https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/665034

Wagner, R. Solassist Learning: MOOC para formação de professores.

http://www.tise.cl/volumen13/TISE2017/38.pdf

Wagner, R., Piovesan, S. D., & Passerino, L. (2019). Solassist Learning: um MOOC para formação em Tecnologia Assistiva/Solassist Learning: a MOOC for Assistive Technology training. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(6), 5235-5256.

http://brjd.com.br/index.php/BRJD/article/view/1739

Lin, J., & Cantoni, L. (2017). Exploring the Experiences of Instructors Teaching Massive Open Online Courses in Tourism and Hospitality: A Mixed Methods Approach.

...

Lin, J. (2018). Exploring the experiences of instructors teaching massive open online courses in tourism and hospitality (Doctoral dissertation, Università della Svizzera italiana).

http://doc.rero.ch/record/306564

Скачать

Альтернативные метрики

Как процитировать

Monedero-Moya, J., Cebrián-Robles, D., & Desenne, P. (2015). Usability and satisfaction in multimedia annotation tools for MOOCs. [Usabilidad y satisfacción en herramientas de anotaciones multimedia para MOOC]. Comunicar, 44, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-06

Доля

           

Oxbridge Publishing House

4 White House Way

B91 1SE Sollihul United Kingdom

Администрация

Редакция

Creative Commons

Данный сайт использует куки-файлы для получения статистических данных о навигации своих пользователей. Если вы продолжите просмотр, мы считаем, что вы принимаете его использование. +info X