写作、创造力和人工智能。大学环境中的 ChatGPT

 María Isabel Vicente-Yagüe-Jara, University of Murcia (西班牙)

 Olivia López-Martínez, University of Murcia (西班牙)

 Verónica Navarro-Navarro, University of Salamanca (西班牙)

 Francisco Cuéllar-Santiago, Miguel Hernández University of Elche (西班牙)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C77-2023-04

关键词

人工智能、写作、语言教学、语言创造力、ChatGPT、广泛语言模型

摘要

该研究旨在研究人工智能 (AI) 系统在教育背景下发展写作创造性的可能性。研究的目的在于提供关于人工智能使用的证据，并有助于了解人工智能在课堂上作为对教学过程的支持的整合。我们建立了两种类型的设计：描述性和比较型的非实验性定量研究，以及前测-后测型的准实验研究。样本由 20 个人工智能系统和 193 名大学生组成，他们应用了西班牙 PIC-A 测试（“成人创意想象力测试”）的游戏 2 和游戏 3。学生们在 ChatGPT 的帮助下重复游戏，以比较他们的作品可能改进的地方。结果突出了AI和学生在游戏2的流畅度、灵活性和叙事原创性等指标上存在统计学上的显着差异。此外，学生在流畅度上的前测和后测分数也存在显着差异、灵活性和独创性。游戏叙事2，以及游戏流畅度3。最后结果表明，无论如何人工智能都无法取代人类的智慧和创造力。

参考资料

Aleksi, D., Cerne, M., Dysvik, A., & Skerlavaj, M. (2016). I want to be creative, but... Preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1077809

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Argondizzo, C. (Ed.) (2012). Creativity and innovation in language education. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0431-8

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Artola, T., Barraca, J., Mosteiro, P., Ancillo, I., Poveda, B., & Sa?nchez, N. (2012). PIC-A. Prueba de Imaginación Creativa para Adultos. TEA Ediciones. https://bit.ly/3O3GEtn

Link Google Scholar

Boden, M.A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203508527

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Boden, M.A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199602919.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bonami, B., Piazentini, L., & Dala-Possa, A. (2020). Education, big data and artificial intelligence: Mixed methods in digital platforms. [Educación, Big Data e Inteligencia Artificial: Metodologías mixtas en plataformas digitales]. Comunicar, 65, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-04

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Breton (Ed.) (2021). Una Europa adaptada a la era digital: la comisión propone nuevas normas y medidas para favorecer la excelencia y la confianza en la inteligencia artificial. Comisión Europea. https://bit.ly/3xWJvez

Link Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creatividad: El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención. Paidós. https://bit.ly/3pyqoqi

Link Google Scholar

Donolo, D., & Elisondo, R. (2007). Creatividad para todos. Consideraciones sobre un grupo particular. Anales de Psicología, 23(1), 148-151. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Edelvives (Ed.) (2023). Edelvives se convierte en la primera editorial en integrar ChatGPT en su plataforma educativa. http://bit.ly/3HN2rSu

Link Google Scholar

Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613(7944), 423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Flores-Vivar, J.M., & F.J. García-Peñalvo (2023). Reflexiones sobre la e?tica, potencialidades y retos de la Inteligencia Artificial en el marco de la Educacio?n de Calidad (ODS4). [Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4)]. Comunicar, 74, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-03

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fyfe, P. (2022). How to cheat on your final paper: Assigning AI for student writing. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01397-z

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gade, R. (2023). Become a published author using ChatGPT. PUBLISHER S21598.

Link Google Scholar

Goleman, D., Kaufman, P., & Ray, M. (2016). El espíritu creativo. Ediciones B. https://bit.ly/44WZpoD

Link Google Scholar

Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Fandiño, A., Armengol-Estapé, J., Pàmies, M., Llop-Palao, J., Silveira-Ocampo, J., Carrino, C.P., González-Aguirre, A., Armentano-Oller, C., Rodríguez-Penagos, C., & Villegas, M. (2022). MarIA: Spanish Language Models. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 68, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.26342/2022-68-3

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_107-1

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hora, S., Badura, K.L., Lemoine, G.J., & Grijalva, E. (2022). A meta-analytic examination of the gender difference in creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 1926-1950. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000999

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hutson, M. (2022). Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature, 611, 192-193. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

INTEF (Ed.) (2022). IA y educacio?n: Orientaciones para los responsables de la elaboracio?n de poli?ticas. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. https://bit.ly/3meypiA

Link Google Scholar

Lee, A. (2023). What are large language models used for? NVIDIA. http://bit.ly/3KHkFH3

Link Google Scholar

Miller, A.I. (2019). The artist in the machine. The world of AI-powered creativity. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11585.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Montero, L. (2023, February 5). ¿Somos un cerebro flotando en una cubeta? [Fallo de sistema, Radio 3]. https://bit.ly/3m1agf0

Link Google Scholar

Munari, B. (2018). Fantasía. Invención, creatividad e imaginación en las comunicaciones visuales. Gustavo Gili. https://bit.ly/3LVYf3P

Link Google Scholar

OCDE (Ed.) (2019). PISA 2021 Creative thinking framework (third draft). https://bit.ly/3IXBdt6

Link Google Scholar

OCDE (Ed.) (2021). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

OpenAI (Ed.) (2023). Classifier. http://bit.ly/3KHD4nd

Link Google Scholar

O’Connor, S., & ChatGPT (2023). Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Education in Practice, 66, 103537-103537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Peirón, F. (2023, January 6). Nueva York prohíbe el ChatGPT en sus escuelas. La Vanguardia. http://bit.ly/41wFCe0

Link Google Scholar

Real Academia Española -RAE- (s.f.). Proyecto Lengua Española e Inteligencia Artificial (LEIA). https://bit.ly/3SFIj92

Link Google Scholar

Renbarger, M. (2023, January 11). Esta emprendedora ha usado ChatGPT para escribir un libro infantil en 2 horas: quiere demostrar que la IA generativa puede ser una poderosa herramienta de aprendizaje. Business Insider. http://bit.ly/3J0Jcpv

Link Google Scholar

Rodrigo-Martín, I., Rodrigo-Martín, L., & Pérez-García, A. (2022). La creatividad como herramienta para comprender la educación: El papel de la creatividad como catalizador de la transformación de la educación. Visual Culture Review, 9(3),1-12. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3533

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sadin, E. (2018). La inteligencia artificial o el desafío del siglo. Caja Negra Editora. https://bit.ly/3MiBQzg

Link Google Scholar

Sánchez, A. (2023, February 12). El chat GPT obliga a repensar los exámenes y las prácticas en las aulas murcianas. La Opinión. http://bit.ly/3ZnoBkv

Link Google Scholar

Selwyn, N., Rivera-Vargas P., Passeron, E., & Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2022). ¿Por qué no todo es (ni debe ser) digital? Interrogantes para pensar sobre digitalización, datificación e inteligencia artificial en educación. In P. Rivera-Vargas, R. Miño-Puigcercós, & E. Passeron (Eds.), Educar con sentido transformador en la universidad (pp. 137-148). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/vx4zr

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/3nUDtd2

Link Google Scholar

Sun, Z., Anbarasan, M., & Kumar, D.P. (2021). Design of online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques. Computational Intelligence, 37(3), 1166-1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12351

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Turing, A.M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2019). International conference on Artificial intelligence and Education, Planning education in the AI Era: Lead the leap: Final report. https://bit.ly/3kEhqpb

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2021). International Forum on AI and the Futures of Education, developing competencies for the AI Era, 7-8 December 2020: Synthesis report. UNESCO. http://bit.ly/3VKXAac

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2022a). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. https://bit.ly/3KBvPx8

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2022b). K-12 AI curricula: A mapping of government-endorsed AI curricula. https://bit.ly/3B6f6xi

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (s.f.). Teaching AI for K-12. https://bit.ly/3KHI6A7

Link Google Scholar

Universidad de Murcia (Ed.) (2022). Co?digo de Buenas Pra?cticas en Investigacio?n de la Universidad de Murcia. http://bit.ly/3M1tlZb

Link Google Scholar

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30. http://bit.ly/3kx6F89

Link Google Scholar

Vázquez, D. (2023, February 13). Lo quieran los profesores o no, ChatGPT ya está aquí: Por qué muchos creen que hay que adoptar la IA en lugar de rechazarla. Business Insider. http://bit.ly/3IxlsI1

Link Google Scholar

Ward, M. (2020). Victorian fictions of computational creativity. In S. Cave, K. Dihal, & S. Dillon (Eds.), AI Narratives: A history of imaginative thinking about intelligent machines (pp. 144-164). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846666.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Yanhua, Z. (2020). The application of artificial intelligence in foreign language teaching. 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE50891.2020.00017

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

The study was carried out within the framework of the R&D&I project “Creatividad verbal como dominio: diseño, validación y aplicación de una prueba fundamentada en la comprensión de textos” [“Verbal creativity as a domain: design, validation and application of a test based on text comprehension”] (PID2020-113731GB-I00), funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. Modalities “Research Challenges” and “Knowledge Generation” (without ERDF funding). Interdisciplinary Research Group: Psicología Educativa y Didáctica de la Lengua, la Literatura y las Artes [Educational Psychology and Didactics of Language, Literature, and the Arts] (E042-08, University of Murcia).

Crossmark

技术信息

收到: 27-02-2023

修订: 31-03-2023

公认: 02-05-2023

OnlineFirst: 30-06-2023

发布日期: 01-10-2023

文章修改时间: 32 天 | 期刊编号的平均时间修订 77: 32 天

文章接受时间: 64 天 | 期刊编号的平均接受时间 77: 76 天

预印本编辑时间: 171 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间预印 77: 183 天

文章编辑时间: 216 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间 77: 228 天

度量

这篇文章的度量

浏览次数: 151399

对摘要的解读: 140596

PDF下载: 10803

的全部指标 77

浏览次数: 1394438

对摘要的解读: 1357710

PDF下载: 36728

被引用