A Look at the Risks and Threats of Artificial Intelligence, From Media Ecology

 Octavio Islas, Autonomous University of Carmen (Мексика)

 Fernando Gutiérrez-Cortés, Tecnológico de Monterrey (Мексика)

 Amaia Arribas-Urrutia, University of Valladolid (Испания)

https://doi.org/10.58262/V33279.1

Ключевые слова

artificial intelligence, media ecology, intelligent agents, McLuhan, risks, technologies

Резюме

From a historical perspective and a prospective analysis, the article aims to understand the role of technologies and their impact on society through the postulates of media ecology. Through this meta-discipline, we delve into the rigorous review of different authors who see technologies as playing a prominent role in shaping the future because they not only influence the culture of societies, but also impact the course, advancement and meaning of history. The text focuses on the advantages and on the explanation of the risks of generative artificial intelligence, identifying eight critical scenarios: weaponization, disinformation, proxy games, weakening, blocking or withholding of value, unwanted emerging goals, deception and power-seeking behavior. Subsequently, CASI regroups them into four threats: malicious use, the AI race, organizational risks and uncontrolled AI. We end the by drawing on McLuhan’s reflections and stressing the need to scale back technologies when they have reached elevated levels of development to minimize their negative impact. Although artificial intelligence has not reached that state, there is a warning about the accelerated evolution and the need for AI literacy as a measure to face risks and threats, in a limited time before it is too late.

Ссылки

Anton, C., & Strate, L. (2012). Korzybsky and… . Institute of General Semantics.

Link Google Scholar

Baker, J., & Crane, D. (2022). The rise of big tech and the challenges for antitrust. Georgetown Law Journal, 111 (1).

Link Google Scholar

Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediations: Understanding new media. MIT Press.

Link Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. (2022). Transhumanism: A guide for the perplexed. Oxford University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2018). The ethics of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence safety and security, 57-69.

Link Google Scholar

Carson, D. (2003). The book of probes. Ginko Press.

Link Google Scholar

Copeland, J. (2004). The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (2010). El origen de las especies. Editorial Porrúa.

Link Google Scholar

Dobbs, M. (2012). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Books.

Link Google Scholar

Gordon, T. (2003). Marshall McLuhan Understandig Media. Ginko Press.

Link Google Scholar

Gould, S., & Vrba, E. (1982). Exaptation: A missing term un the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4-5 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300004310

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: Breve historia del mañana. Debate.

Link Google Scholar

Haugen, F. (2023). La verdad sobre Facebook. Deusto.

Link Google Scholar

Hendrycks, D. (2023). Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humans.

Link Google Scholar

Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., & Woodside, T. (2023). An overview of ctastropchic aIl risks. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.12001.pdf

Link Google Scholar

Kaiser, B. (2019). La dictadura de los datos. Harper-Collins.

Link Google Scholar

Kauffman, S. (1995). A home in the universe. Oxford University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Korzybsky, A. (1993). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of General Semantics.

Link Google Scholar

Kwon, H., & Kim, S. (2020). The Impact of Deepfakes on Political Campaigns. Journal of Information Warfare, 19(3), 10-18.

Link Google Scholar

Levinson, P. (1999). Digital McLuhan. Routledge.

Link Google Scholar

Logan, R. (2004). The alphabet effect: A media ecology understanding of the making of western civilization. Hampton Press.

Link Google Scholar

Logan, R. (2013). McLuhan misunderstood. Key.

Link Google Scholar

Logan, R. (2016). Understanding new media. Peter Lang.

Link Google Scholar

Lopezosa, C. (2023). La Inteligencia artificial generativa en la comunicacio?n cienti?fica: retos y oportunidades. Revista de Investigacio?n e Innovacio?n en Ciencias de la Salud, 5(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.211

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of typographic man. Vanguard.

Link Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The extension of man. McGraw-Hill.

Link Google Scholar

McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message. Ginko Press.

Link Google Scholar

McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1998). Laws of media: The new science. University of Toronto Press.

Link Google Scholar

Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. Oxford University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Minsky, M. L. (1961). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Link Google Scholar

Moor, J, (2006). The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference: The Next Fifty Years. AI Magazine, 27(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1911

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1958). The logic theory machine: A model of human thought. Behavioral Science, 3(3), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1956.1056797

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy. Methuen.

Link Google Scholar

Pereda, F., & Harris, J. (2020). The future of human enhancement: Ethical issues and challenges. Science, 367(6485), 130-133.

Link Google Scholar

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Postman, N. (1970). The reformed English curriculum. En Eurich, C. (Ed.). High School 1980: The shape of the future in American Secondary education. Pitman.

Link Google Scholar

Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Alfred A. Knopf.

Link Google Scholar

Ramos-Polla?n, R. (2020). Perspectivas y retos de las te?cnicas de inteligencia artificial en el a?mbito de las ciencias sociales y de la comunicacio?n. Anuario Electro?nico de Estudios en Comunicacio?n Social “Disertaciones”, 13(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/disertaciones/a.7774

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Schwab, K. (2016). La cuarta revolución industrial. Debate.

Link Google Scholar

Snowden, E. (2019). Vigilancia permanente: la amenaza a la libertad y la democracia. Debate.

Link Google Scholar

Strate, L. (2004). A media ecology review. Communication Research Trends, 23(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect137

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Strate, L. (2006). Echoes and reflections: On media ecology as a field of study. Hampton Press.

Link Google Scholar

Strate, L., & Wachtel, E. (2005). The Legacy of McLuhan. Hampton Press.

Link Google Scholar

Susskind, L. (1981). The hierarchy problem and string theory. Physics Letters B, 105(5), 269-272.

Link Google Scholar

Susskind, L. (1982). Superstring theory. Physics Today, 35(9), 223-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(82)90087-4

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Susskind, L. (1983). The beginning of the universe and the end of string theory. Scientific American, 248(5), 48-56.

Link Google Scholar

Susskind, L. (2008). The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the Universe Safe for Quantum Mechanics. Little, Brown and Company.

Link Google Scholar

Tucker, J. A. (2023). Computational Social Science for Policy and Quality of Democracy: Public Opinion, Hate Speech, Misinformation, and Foreign Influence Campaigns. Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy, 381-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_20

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Wolfe, T. (2010). Foreword. In McLuhan, S., & Staines, D. (Eds.). Understanding me. Lectures and Interviews. McClelland & Stewart Ltd.

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Техническая спецификация

Получила: 30-09-2023

пересмотренный: 23-06-2024

Принятый: 15-08-2024

OnlineFirst: 30-09-2024

Дата публикации: 01-10-2024

Время пересмотра статьи: 267 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 79: 299 дней

Время принятия статьи: 320 дней | Время приема Номер 79: 350 дней

Время редактирования препринта: 322 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 79: 352 дней

Время редактирования статьи: 367 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 79: 397 дней

метрика

Метрики этой статьи

Просмотров: 4733

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 3488

загрузки PDF-файлов: 1245

Полные метрики 79

Просмотров: 31527

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 24607

загрузки PDF-файлов: 6920

Цитируется