STEM Kit and IBPT Approach to Develop Research Skills in Engineering and Nursing Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23183137Keywords:
Formative Research, Research Competencies, IBPT, Educational Technology, Educational STEM Kit, Higher Education.Abstract
Formative research constitutes a fundamental component of higher education, particularly in public universities where limitations are still observed in the early development of students’ research competencies. The present study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Problem- and Technology-Based Research (IBPT) approach, integrated with an educational STEM kit and visual programming, for the development of research competencies in engineering and nursing students from public universities in Peru. A quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design and non-probabilistic intentional sampling was employed. A total of 110 first-year students participated, developing formative research projects focused on real problems in their local context through the use of innovative technological resources. The evaluation of research competencies was conducted considering the four phases of the IBPT approach: problem understanding, activity design, activity execution, and solution review. The results showed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) across all evaluated phases in both engineering and nursing students. The greatest progress was observed in the solution review phase, reflecting the strengthening of critical thinking, experimentation, optimization, autonomy, and critical attitude. Likewise, no significant differences were identified between both academic programs regarding the use of technological resources, demonstrating the cross-disciplinary applicability of the IBPT approach. It is concluded that the integration of the IBPT approach with accessible educational technologies promotes active learning, experimentation, and the transfer of knowledge to real contexts, contributing to the strengthening of research competencies among university students.
References
Abichandani, P., Sivakumar, V., Lobo, D., Iaboni, C. y Shekhar, P. (2022). Internet-of-Things Curriculum, Pedagogy, and Assessment for STEM Education: A Review of Literature. IEEE Access, 10, 38351–38369. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3164709
Acuña Acuña, E. G. (2023). Strategies to Promote Research in Engineering Students in Latin American Universities. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 17, e867. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.17.2023.e867
Álvarez-Ochoa, R. I., Cabrera-Berrezueta, L. B. y Mena-Clerque, S. E. (2022). Competencias investigativas en estudiantes de Educación Superior: aproximaciones desde estudiantes de Medicina. Digital Publisher CEIT, 7(4-2), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2022.4-2.1425
Aparicio-Gómez, O.-Y., Ostos-Ortiz, O.-L. y Abadía-García, C. (2024). Convergence Between Emerging Technologies and Active Methodologies in the University. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2508
Baluarte-Araya, C. y Bedregal-Alpaca, N. (2021). Valoration of Problem-Based Learning as a strategy to develop Formative Research in the subject of Electronic Business. En 2021 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE51952.2021.9429093
Beng, J. T., Dewi, F. I., Amanto, A. F., Fiscarina, C., Chandra, D., Lusiana, F., Wangi, V. H., et al. (2022). STEM Learning Model Design Using IoT for Primary School Students. En 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021) (pp. 1117–1122). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.176
Boakye, Dorothy S., Kwashie, Atswei A., Adjorlolo, S. y Korsah, Kwadwo A. (2024). Nursing Education for Sustainable Development: A Concept Analysis. Nursing Open, 11(10), e70058. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70058
Cabrera-Berrezueta, B., Cárdenas-Cordero, N. y García-Herrera, D. G. (2020). La investigación formativa en Educación Superior: modelo para docentes y estudiantes. Killkana Social, 4(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.26871/killkanasocial.v4i2.612
Capone, R. (2022). Blended Learning and Student-centered Active Learning Environment: a Case Study with STEM Undergraduate Students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00195-5
Chacón-Castro, M., Buele, J., López-Rueda, A. D. y Jadán-Guerrero, J. (2023). Pólya’s Methodology for Strengthening Problem-Solving Skills in Differential Equations: A Case Study in Colombia. Computers, 12(11), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12110239
Crisol-Moya, E., Romero-López, M. A. y Caurcel-Cara, M. J. (2020). Active Methodologies in Higher Education: Perception and Opinion as Evaluated by Professors and Their Students in the Teaching-Learning Process. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01703
Dúo-Terrón, P. (2023). Analysis of Scratch Software in Scientific Production for 20 Years: Programming in Education to Develop Computational Thinking and STEAM Disciplines. Education Sciences, 13(4), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040404
Epiquién Chancahuana, M., Oc Carrasco, O. J., Farje Escobedo, J. D. y Silva Díaz, Y. A. (2023). Investigación formativa en el desarrollo de competencias investigativas en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 29(4), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i4.41264
Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2020). La investigación formativa. Una reflexión teórica. Conrado, 16(74), 45–53. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14330/CLA01000507306
Esteban-Yago, M., García-Luque, O., López-Martínez, M. y Rodríguez-Pasquín, M. (2023). Teaching Materials for Active Methodologies in University Education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(8), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i8.6066
Estrada Molina, O. (2014). Sistematización teórica sobre la competencia investigativa. Revista Electrónica Educare, 18(2), 177–194.
Fidai, A., Capraro, M. M. y Capraro, R. M. (2020). “Scratch”-ing computational thinking with Arduino: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100726
Flores González, E. y Trujillo Rodríguez, A. V. (2024). Metacognición y autorregulación del aprendizaje. Fedumar Pedagogí a y Educación, 11(1), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.31948/fpe.v11i1.4299
Fronza, I., Corral, L. y Pahl, C. (2019). Combining Block-Based Programming and Hardware Prototyping to Foster Computational Thinking. En Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 55–60). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349266.3351410
Hernández, R. M., Marino-Jiménez, M., Rivero Forton, Y. y Sánchez, N. (2020). Research in University Students: Real Needs for the Implementation of a Formative Research Program. ACADEMIA, (20-21), 154–176. https://doi.org/10.26220/aca.3445
Huseynli, M., Bub, U. y Ogbuachi, M. C. (2022). Development of a Method for the Engineering of Digital Innovation Using Design Science Research. Information, 13(12), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13120573
Jahudin, J. y Siew, N. M. (2024). The Effects of Polya’s Problem Solving with Digital Bar Model on the Algebraic Thinking Skills of Seventh Graders. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(3), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.390
Lapa-Asto, U., Tirado-Mendoza, G. y Roman-Gonzalez, A. (2019). Impact of Formative Research on Engineering students. En 2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE.2019.8875842
Llanos de Tarazona, M. (2019). Uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación y habilidades investigativas en estudiantes de enfermería. Revista Peruana de Ciencias de la Salud, 1(4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.37711/rpcs.2019.1.4.48
Llulluy-Nuñez, D., Neglia V, L. F., Vilchez-Sandoval, J., Sotomayor-Beltran, C., Andrade-Arenas, L. y Meneses-Claudio, B. (2021). The Impact Of The Work Of Junior Researchers And Research Professors On The Improvement Of The Research Competences Of Engineering Students At A University In North Lima. En Proceedings of the 19th LACCEI International Multi Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (pp. 1–6). LACCEI Inc. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2021.1.1.371
Marín-Marín, J.-A., García-Tudela, P. A. y Duo-Terrón, P. (2024). Computational thinking and programming with Arduino in education: A systematic review for secondary education. Heliyon, 10(8), e29177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29177
Müller, U., Hancock, D., Wang, C., Stricker, T. y Liu, Q. (2025). Implementing Education for Sustainable Development in Organizations of Adult and Continuing Education: Perspectives of Leaders in China, Germany, and the USA. Sustainability, 17(10), 4702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104702
Neo, C. H., Wong, J. K., Chai, V. C., Chua, Y. L. y Hoh, Y. H. (2021). Computational Thinking in Solving Engineering Problems – A Conceptual Model. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.2.3.2021
Niousha, R., Saito, D., Washizaki, H. y Fukazawa, Y. (2022). Gender Characteristics and Computational Thinking in Scratch. En Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (pp. 1344). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545947.3576290
Olaniyan, A. O. y Govender, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Polya Problem-Solving and Target-Task Collaborative Learning Approaches in Electricity amongst High School Physics Students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.765
Önde?, R. N. (2025). Effects of STEM Practices on Students’ Problem-Solving Skills: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(2), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4697
Ortega Ruipérez, B. y Asensio Brouard, M. (2021). Evaluar el Pensamiento Computacional mediante Resolución de Problemas: Validación de un Instrumento de Evaluación. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 14(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2021.14.1.009
Palacios Serna, L. I. (2021). Una revisión sistemática: Actitud hacia la investigación en universidades de Latinoamérica. Comuni@cción: Revista De Investigación En Comunicación Y Desarrollo, 12(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.12.3.533
Paucar-Curasma, R. (2023). Influencia del pensamiento computacional en los procesos de resolución de problemas en los estudiantes de ingeniería de reciente ingreso a la universidad [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional del Santa]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14278/4199
Paucar-Curasma, R., Cerna-Ruiz, L. P., Acra-Despradel, C., Villalba-Condori, K. O., Massa-Palacios, L. A., Olivera-Chura, A. y Esteban-Robladillo, I. (2023). Development of Computational Thinking through STEM Activities for the Promotion of Gender Equality. Sustainability, 15(16), 12335. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612335
Paucar-Curasma, R., Unsihuay Tovar, R. F., Acra-Despradel, C. y Villalba-Condori, K. O. (2025). IBPT: An Approach to Promote Research and Technological Competencies in Higher Education. Sustainability, 17(20), 9309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209309
Pozuelo-Muñoz, J., Calvo-Zueco, E., Sánchez-Sánchez, E. y Cascarosa-Salillas, E. (2023). Science Skills Development through Problem-Based Learning in Secondary Education. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111096
Pratama, K. A. y Widjajanti, D. B. (2024). STEM: Its Potential in Developing Students’ Computational Thinking. KnE Social Sciences, 9(13), 1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16033
PROCIENCIA-CONCYTEC. (2024). Investigadores de Huancavelica desarrollan dispositivo educativo para facilitar aprendizaje sencillo para universitarios - Noticias - Programa Nacional de Investigación Científica y Estudios Avanzados - Plataforma del Estado Peruano. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/prociencia/noticias/919234
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. y Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8
Salguero Rosero, J. R., Rodríguez Espinosa, J. R., Salguero Rosero, R. M. y Rosas Chávez, P. X. (2025). Conceptual Appropriation and Perceived Skills in Formative Research Among University Students. Education Sciences, 15(8), 944. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080944
Sarmiento, M. (2020). Lenguajes y Entornos de Programación para Fortalecer El Desarrollo de Competencias Concernientes al Pensamiento Computacional. Hamut´ay, 7(3), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.21503/hamu.v7i3.2200
Seo, W. J. y Kim, M. (2024). Utilization of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Topic Modeling Analysis. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111234
Shen, H., Chen, C., Yan, S., Hallensleben, C., van der Kleij, R., Li, M., Dai, H., et al. (2024). Online digital health and informatics education for undergraduate nursing students in China: impacts and recommendations. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 803. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05785-5
Tan, W.-L., Samsudin, M. A., Ismail, M. E. y Ahmad, N. J. (2020). Gender Differences In Students’ Achievements In Learning Concepts Of Electricity Via Steam Integrated Approach Utilizing Scratch. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(3), 423–448. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.423
Tuan, B. A., Thao, D. B. y Ho, T. D. C. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT) in Education for Sustainability: Using STEMTech Model to Design Smart Home System for Experiential Learning at Secondary Schools. En 5th International European Conference On Interdisciplinary Scientific Research (pp. 466–481). IKSAD Publishing House. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358671924
Turpo-Gebera, O., Quispe, P. M., Paz, L. C. y Gonzales-Miñán, M. (2020). Formative research at the university: Meanings conferred by faculty at an Education Department. Educação e Pesquisa, 46, e215876. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202046215876
Vale, I., Barbosa, A., Peixoto, A. y Fernandes, F. (2022). Solving Problems through Engineering Design: An Exploratory Study with Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences, 12(12), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120889
Valencia, J., Macias, J. y Valencia, A. (2015). Formative Research in Higher Education: Some Reflections. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 940–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.562
Yahya, L. B., Naciri, A., Radid, M. y Chemsi, G. (2024). Immersive Simulation in Nursing and Midwifery Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 21, 19. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.19
Yasar, O. (2018). Computational Thinking, Redefined. En Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 72–80). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182505
Zhang, J. y Liu, J. (2018). Construction of Scaffolding Instruction Mode for Mblock for Arduino Maker Course Based on Design Thinking. En Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering (pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3207677.3278031
Zúñiga-Cueva, J., Vidal-Duarte, E. y Alvarez, A. P. (2021). Methodological strategy for the development of research skills in engineering students: A proposal and its results. En Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 2525–2536). IEOM Society International. https://doi.org/10.46254/SA02.20210745
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Comunicar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
