Selective Agency and Platformized Privacy: Explaining Youth Participation in Datafied Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23184880Keywords:
Platformization, Digital Privacy, Selective Agency, Algorithmic Governance, Youth Social Media, Networked VisibilityAbstract
This study reassesses the explanatory scope of Privacy Calculus Theory (PCT) within platformized social media environments shaped by datafication, algorithmic governance, and participation-driven visibility regimes. While prior research has documented inconsistecies between privacy concern and disclosure behaviour, limited empirical work has examined how awareness, disclosure orientation, and behavioural responses interact under such conditions. Drawing on survey data from 386 Instagram and TikTok users in a high social-media-penetration context, the study investigates how experiential awareness of platform data practices, disclosure orientation, privacy-protective behaviour, and high-connectivity participation intersect in digitally mediated interaction. Findings reveal a differentiated configuration of privacy negotiation: experiential awareness significantly predicts localized protective actions but does not constrain disclosure willingness or expansive connectivity practices. Disclosure orientation emerges as the strongest predictor of visibility-enhancing participation. Conceptualized as selective agency, this pattern refines PCT by demonstrating how behavioural responses to privacy concerns are mediated by infrastructural participation logics that normalize connectivity and relational visibility. The study contributes by specifying the behavioural boundary conditions of privacy calculus in contemporary datafied communication environments.
References
Ahmmad, M., Shahzad, K., Iqbal, A., & Latif, M. (2025). Trap of Social Media Algorithms: A Systematic Review of Research on Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Their Impact on Youth. Societies, 15(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301
Akter, M., Park, J. K., Headrick, C. R., Page, X., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2025). Calculating Connection vs. Risk: Understanding How Youth Negotiate Digital Privacy and Security with Peers Online. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3757564
Arsel, Z. (2026). Platform capture: a review of the state of the art of research on platforms and a research agenda. Journal of Marketing Management, 42(3-4), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2025.2549741
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017). The privacy paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
Barth, S., de Jong, M. D. T., Junger, M., Hartel, P. H., & Roppelt, J. C. (2019). Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources. Telematics and Informatics, 41, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.03.003
Choi, S. (2023). Privacy Literacy on Social Media: Its Predictors and Outcomes. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(1), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041892
Cicchirillo, V. J. (2020). The impact of video game character viewpoints and task on perceptions of cognitive and similarity identification. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(4), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-4-2
Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
Cristofaro, M., Augier, M., Lovallo, D., Abatecola, G., & Leoni, L. (2025). Behavioral strategy in evolution: A review and conceptual framework. European Management Journal, 43(6), 914–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.10.002
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.104
De Boer, I., Herder, E., & Van Lieshoud, M. (2021). The Illusion of Control in Privacy Trade-Offs: Does Familiarity Play a Role? In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 338–344). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450614.3464471
Dienlin, T., & Metzger, M. J. (2016). An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for SNSs: Analyzing Self-Disclosure and Self-Withdrawal in a Representative U.S. Sample. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12163
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
Hastuti, H., Maulana, H. F., Lawelai, H., & Suherman, A. (2025). Algorithmic influence and media legitimacy: a systematic review of social media’s impact on news production. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1667471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1667471
Inverardi, P., Migliarini, P., & Palmiero, M. (2023). Systematic review on privacy categorisation. Computer Science Review, 49, 100574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100574
Jozani, M., Ayaburi, E., Ko, M., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020). Privacy concerns and benefits of engagement with social media-enabled apps: A privacy calculus perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106260
Kang, H., Yang, T., Banu, N., & Oh, J. (2025). Latent privacy management profiles on algorithmic social media: cross-cultural insights into privacy protection motivations and management behaviors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 30(6), zmaf021. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf021
Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 607–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12062
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). Network Media LOGIC: Some Conceptual Considerations. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, A. O. Larsson, E. Skogerbo, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics (pp. 23–38). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299-4
Klug, K., & Strang, C. (2019). The Filter Bubble in Social Media Communication: How Users Evaluate Personalized Information in the Facebook Newsfeed. In T. Osburg & S. Heinecke (Eds.), Media Trust in a Digital World: Communication at Crossroads (pp. 159–180). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30774-5_12
Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
Malandrino, D., Petta, A., Scarano, V., Serra, L., Spinelli, R., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2013). Privacy awareness about information leakage: who knows what about me? In Proceedings of the 12th ACM workshop on Workshop on privacy in the electronic society (pp. 279–284). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2517840.2517868
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995
Meier, Y., & Krämer, N. C. (2022). The Privacy Calculus Revisited: An Empirical Investigation of Online Privacy Decisions on Between- and Within-Person Levels. Communication Research, 51(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221102101
Neves, J., Turel, O., & Oliveira, T. (2024). Explaining Social Media Use Reduction As an Adaptive Coping Mechanism: The Roles of Privacy Literacy, Social Media Addiction and Exhaustion. Information Systems Management, 42(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2024.2332187
Nuzulita, N., & Subriadi, A. P. (2020). The role of risk-benefit and privacy analysis to understand different uses of social media by Generations X, Y, and Z in Indonesia. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86(3), e12122. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12122
Obar, J. A., & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2020). The biggest lie on the Internet: ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486870
Ou, M., Zheng, H., Li, B., & Luo, C. (2026). The Dark Side of Algorithms: How Ethical and Privacy Considerations Affect Individuals’ Engagement With Health Information on Social Media? International Journal of Communication, 20, 148–171. https://doi.org/10.65476/7tp42020
Paine, C., Reips, U.-D., Stieger, S., Joinson, A., & Buchanan, T. (2007). Internet users’ perceptions of ‘privacy concerns’ and ‘privacy actions’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(6), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.12.001
Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & Duffy, B. E. (2021). Platforms and Cultural Production. Polity. https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9781509540501
Uwayezu, E., Tenney, D., & McAdams, A. (2026). Evaluating social media user trade-off between free platform use and privacy concerns of AI-powered targeted advertising. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 16(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01518-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Comunicar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
