Racist Discourses on Social Network X as a Delegitimization Strategy of the Indigenous Uprising: An Analysis of the October 2019 Protests in Ecuador

Authors

  • Norma Allyson Armijos Triviño Universidad de Guayaquil. Av. Delta s/n y Av. Kennedy, Guayaquil 090510, Ciudadela Universitaria (Ecuador)
  • Victoria Michelle Zambrano Freire Universidad de Guayaquil. Av. Delta s/n y Av. Kennedy, Guayaquil 090510, Ciudadela Universitaria (Ecuador)
  • Manoly Andrea Villamar Pérez Universidad de Guayaquil. Av. Delta s/n y Av. Kennedy, Guayaquil 090510, Ciudadela Universitaria (Ecuador)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23192563

Keywords:

Digital Racism, Hate Speech, Social Protest, Indigenous Peoples, Digital Public Sphere, Ecuador

Abstract

The Indigenous uprising of October 2019 in Ecuador constituted one of the most significant episodes of social mobilization in recent decades and generated an intense discursive dispute across digital environments. Although this event has been examined from political, economic, and sociological perspectives, limited attention has been paid to the role of racist discourses disseminated through social media as mechanisms for delegitimizing Indigenous protest. In this context, the present study aims to analyze racist discourses on the social network X as a strategy for delegitimizing the Indigenous uprising of October 2019 in Ecuador, identifying their main discursive categories, dissemination mechanisms, and effects on the construction of digital public opinion. The study adopts a mixed-methods approach that combines Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with computational tools for content analysis, network analysis, and the examination of digital affect. A corpus of 80 public posts was analyzed, selected according to thematic criteria related to the Indigenous movement and racializing expressions circulated during the protest period. The findings reveal that racist discourses were primarily articulated through strategies of criminalization, dehumanization, de-Indigenization, and cultural stigmatization, reinforced by algorithmic amplification dynamics and the intervention of highly visible actors on the platform. In addition, counter-narratives promoted by Indigenous organizations and allied actors were identified, aimed at reclaiming the legitimacy of social demands and denouncing practices of structural discrimination. The main contribution of this study lies in providing empirical evidence on the relationship between digital racism, social protest, and the construction of political legitimacy in Latin American contexts. The findings contribute to understanding how digital platforms can reproduce historical inequalities while simultaneously serving as spaces of symbolic resistance and contestation over the public meaning of social events.

References

Agudelo, F. I. y Olbrych, N. (2022). It’s Not How You Say It, It’s What You Say: Ambient Digital Racism and Racial Narratives on Twitter. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 20563051221122441. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221122441

Ahmed, S. (2005). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700372

Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., Chen, V. H. H., Cai, M., Chen, A., Emes, C. S., Yu, V., et al. (2024). Social media and anti-immigrant prejudice: a multi-method analysis of the role of social media use, threat perceptions, and cognitive ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1280366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1280366

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4

Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 930–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130

Mellor, D. (2003). Contemporary Racism in Australia: The Experiences of Aborigines. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250914

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001

Snow, D. A. y Benford, R. D. (1992). Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. En A. D. Morris y C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 133–155). Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300054866/frontiers-in-social-movement-theory

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. En D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, y D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466–485). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22

Wodak, R. y Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235192

Published

2026-10-07

How to Cite

Norma Allyson Armijos Triviño, Victoria Michelle Zambrano Freire, & Manoly Andrea Villamar Pérez. (2026). Racist Discourses on Social Network X as a Delegitimization Strategy of the Indigenous Uprising: An Analysis of the October 2019 Protests in Ecuador. Comunicar, 34(87), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23192563

Issue

Section

Research Article