Keywords
Neuroscience, digital empathy, technology, education, communication, Basic Empathy Scale
Abstract
This study aims to present the extent to which online education influenced the level of empathy displayed by university students. The research relies on a self-evaluated applied survey in two European countries: Portugal and Romania. The participants in this research are 1,085 students enrolled in Communication Studies programs. The purpose of this study is to unfold the connection between gender, exposure to digital technology, empathy level according to the Basic Empathy Scale applied to young adults, and online education self-perception that involves the use of webcams. Empathy can have positive effects on students’ satisfaction and increase students’ outcomes. The shift from a physical environment to a digital one brought significant challenges that most students and teachers were not ready for. The digital environment influences how empathy is expressed. The present research found evidence of a relationship between exposure to technology usage, emotional contagion, and gender. This suggests that understanding the emotions of others might be inhibited during digital education. Also, the most relevant factor of empathy variation in online education is gender. The findings of the present research may contribute to the design of activities or programs that could foster empathy expression during online education for young adults.
References
Ahmed, A. (2022). Emotions in technology-mediated pedagogical spaces. In A. Ahmed, Exploring Silences in the Field of Computer Assisted Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06501-9_5
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Batson, C.D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.). The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3-15). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Batson, C.D., Duncan, B.D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bialystok, L., & Kukar, P. (2018). Authenticity and empathy in education. Theory and Research in Education, 16(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878517746647
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press. https://bit.ly/3kynzDt
Link Google Scholar
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., d'Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679-691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032297
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Hodges, S.D. (2006). The social neuroscience of empathy. In P.A.M. Van-Lange (Ed.), Bridging Social Psychology (pp. 103-109). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410616982-21
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Jackson, P.L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Deng, L., Zhou, Y., & Hu, Q. (2022). Off-task social media multitasking during class: Determining factors and mediating mechanism. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(14), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00321-1
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D.I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
DESI (Ed.) (2022). Digital economy and society index report. European Commission. https://bit.ly/41JhjcH
Link Google Scholar
Duarte, A., & Riedl, K. (2022). Perceived learning effectiveness and student satisfaction: Lessons learned from an online multinational intensive program. In C. Smith & G. Zhou (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching Strategies for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse International Students (pp. 326-344). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8921-2
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The basic empathy scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.020
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Feshbach, N.D., & Feshbach, S. (2009). Empathy and education. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 85-97). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0008
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2020). Car: Companion to Applied Regression. [R package]. https://bit.ly/40adBXV
Link Google Scholar
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Gerdes, K.E., Lietz, C.A., & Segal, E.A. (2011). Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.83
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Gerdes, K.E., Segal, E.A., & Lietz, C.A. (2010). Conceptualising and measuring empathy. British Journal of Social Work, 40(7), 2326-2343. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq048
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hat?eld, E., Rapson, R.L., & Le, Y.C.L. (2009). Emotional contagion and empathy. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 19-30). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0003
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., & Rapson, R.L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1997.10403399
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hosszu, A., Rughinis, C., Rughinis, R., & Rosner, D. (2022). Webcams and social interaction during online classes: Identity work, presentation of self, and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761427
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Joia, L.A., & Lorenzo, M. (2021). Zoom In, Zoom Out: The Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the classroom. Sustainability, 13(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052531
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D.P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kalton, G. (2020). Introduction to survey sampling. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984683
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Konrath, S.H., O'Brien, E.H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. [R package]. https://bit.ly/3ZUQWPH
Link Google Scholar
Li, L., Gow, A.D.I., & Zhou, J. (2020). The role of positive emotions in education: A neuroscience perspective. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(3), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12244
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lowenthal, P.R. (2010). Social presence. In S. Dasgupta (Ed.), Social computing: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 129-136). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-984-7.ch011
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Nelson-Jones, R. (2005). Practical counselling and helping skills. How to use the life skills helping model. Sage Publications. https://bit.ly/3ZoEXJz
Link Google Scholar
Okoye, K., Rodriguez-Tort, J.A., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Technology-mediated teaching and learning process: A conceptual study of educators' response amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technology, 26(6), 7225-7257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10527-x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
R Core Team (Ed.) (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1). [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org
Link Google Scholar
Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered theraphy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Constable.
Link Google Scholar
Ross, K., & Padovani, C. (2017). Gender equality and the media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709024
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Stephan, W.G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social issues, 55(4), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00144
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2005). The development of virtual learning communities. In S.R. Hiltz, & R. Goldman (Eds.), Asynchronous Learning Networks (pp. 239-260). Hampton Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611482-19
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2002). Beyond empathy: Confronting homophobia in critical education courses. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(3-4), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v06n03_18
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Terry, C., & Cain, J. (2016). The emerging issue of digital empathy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(4), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80458
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Titchener, E.B. (1909). Lectures of the experimental psychology of thought processes. Cornell University Library.
Link Google Scholar
UNESCO (Ed.) (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. Unesco. https://bit.ly/3ZpRHjh
Link Google Scholar
Villarroel, V., & González, A. (2023). Students' learning perception in engineering, health and education during emergency remote education in Chile. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.41
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Technical information
Received: 29-12-2022
Revised: 21-01-2023
Accepted: 23-02-2023
OnlineFirst: 30-05-2023
Publication date: 01-07-2023
Article revision time: 23 days | Average time revision issue 76: -6 days
Article acceptance time: 56 days | Average time of acceptance issue 76: 72 days
Preprint editing time: 139 days | Average editing time preprint issue 76: 155 days
Article editing time: 184 days | Average editing time issue 76: 200 days
Metrics
Metrics of this article
Views: 33120
Abstract readings: 32324
PDF downloads: 796
Full metrics of Comunicar 76
Views: 408275
Abstract readings: 398833
PDF downloads: 9442
Cited by
Cites in Web of Science
Currently there are no citations to this document
Cites in Scopus
Currently there are no citations to this document
Cites in Google Scholar
Currently there are no citations to this document
Alexandre Duarte, Lisboa (Portugal)
